Text messaging is a high-attention, high-stakes channel. Messages are opened and seen almost immediately, which makes every text highly visible. Small differences in wording, tone, or structure can have a meaningful impact on engagement and action.
As teams get better at reaching the right audience, the next challenge becomes clear: knowing what message will actually perform.
Today, we are introducing A/B Testing, a new capability designed to help teams answer that question and improve results with every send.
In a channel where messages appear directly on someone’s phone, every message needs to earn its place.
A/B Testing is a built-in workflow in the Broadcast Composer that allows teams to test two versions of a message, compare performance, select a winning version, and automatically send it to the rest of the audience.
Instead of choosing a message based on instinct, teams can validate performance before sending at scale.
With A/B Testing, you can:
Testing and distribution happen in a single workflow.
With tools like Audience Import and Audience Groups, teams can bring in their audience and target it more effectively.
But even with strong segmentation, messaging decisions are often based on assumptions:
In a high-attention channel, these decisions directly impact results.
A/B Testing solves the “what should I send?” problem by helping teams evaluate messaging before it is sent broadly.
A/B Testing allows teams to experiment with the parts of a message that influence performance.
Common use cases include:
Message framing
Test two versions of a headline or opening line to see which drives more engagement.
Tone and style
Compare a direct message with a more narrative or conversational version.
Calls to action
Test an offer-driven message against a value-driven message.
Message structure
Evaluate differences such as short versus long messages or the use of emojis.
These tests make it possible to evaluate messaging decisions using real audience behavior.
Without structured testing, messaging performance is difficult to improve consistently.
Teams often rely on intuition or isolated results, making it harder to identify patterns in what works.
With A/B Testing, teams can:
Over time, this creates a feedback loop where each campaign contributes to better performance across the program.
Below are examples of how different teams use A/B Testing to improve messaging performance.
Use Case: Optimizing Breaking News Alerts
A publisher sending a breaking news alert might test:
Version A
A direct, factual headlineVersion B
A more urgency-driven or curiosity-based headline
The system sends both versions to a small portion of subscribers, measures engagement, and automatically sends the selected winning version to the rest.
Result: Higher click-through rates on time-sensitive content and clearer insight into which headline styles consistently drive engagement.
Use Case: Driving Revenue from Product Recommendations
An editorial commerce team might test:
Version A
A direct product recommendation with a clear value statementVersion B
A scarcity or urgency-driven message highlighting why the product is worth attention now
The system sends both versions to a small portion of subscribers, measures performance, and automatically sends the selected winning version to the rest.
Result: Higher click-through and conversion rates on product recommendations and clearer insight into which messaging drives purchasing behavior.
Use Case: Improving Product Launch Messaging
A creator announcing a new product might test:
Version A
A high-energy launch message focused on excitementVersion B
A story-driven message explaining the product and its value
The system measures engagement and automatically sends the selected winning version to the full audience.
Result: Increased sales at launch and a better understanding of which messaging style resonates most.
Use Case: Driving Conversions
A marketing team targeting a high-intent segment might test:
Version A
A direct promotional offerVersion B
A value-focused message highlighting benefits
The system highlights performance results and automatically sends the selected winning version to the rest of the audience.
Result: Higher conversion rates and improved campaign performance over time.
A/B Testing is designed to work within the existing broadcast workflow. The goal is not just to generate insights. It is to improve performance within the same campaign.
There is no need for external tools or manual audience setup:
This allows teams to test and improve messaging without adding complexity.
A/B Testing adds a performance layer on top of audience targeting and activation.
Once teams are reaching the right audience, the next step is improving what they send. Over time, each campaign contributes to a clearer understanding of what messaging performs best, helping improve results across future sends.
A/B Testing is available directly within the Broadcast Composer.
Create two message variants, define your test audience, and run your send. The system handles testing, measurement, and distribution of the winning version.
If you are already using Subtext, you can start testing your next message immediately.
If you are new to Subtext and want to see how performance-driven messaging can improve engagement and conversions, schedule a demo to learn more.